1. Relevant Extract of CGPDTM Examination report

Based on search conducted in TKDL database the Examiner concluded:

“The present claims are considered as traditional knowledge. It is considered to be aggrigation of known properties of traditionally known conponents. Claims are not allowable u/s 3(p).

Claims lack novelty and inventive step in view of the following formulations disclosed in TKDL database.

1. AB/170

2. AK/539

3. AK/641

4. AK/699

5. AK/705

6. AK/708

7. AK/755

8. AK11/3596

9. AK2/528

10. AT/210

11. AT/76

12. BP/118

13. BP/119

14. BP/198

15. BP/584

16. HG/1274

17. HG/2026

18. HG/2087

19. HG/2091

20. RG/1170

21. RG/623

22. RG10/47

23. RG12/1317

24. RG13/1030

25. RG3/900

26. RG7/212

27. RS/1573

28. RS/257

29. RS/783

30. RS21/123

31. RS21/125

32. RS21/126

33. RS22/844

34. RS23/758

35. SJ/113

36. SJ/835

37. SJ/981

38. SJ/983

39. SJ/989

40. SM/696

41. VS/3026

42. VS/3447 “

Full examination report can be referred at 1864-DEL-2006.pdf

2. Outcomes of Examination Report

As the outcome of TKDL references and other documents cited in examination report, Controller decided to refuse the Application 1864/DEL/2006 for grant of patent on 14.03.2013.